Wikipedia interaction at conference disclosure, to the state administration of industry and commerce to baidu to mention antitrust investigations about the progress, interactive encyclopedia PanHaiDong CEO says, has formally to mention of the court of haidian baidu lawsuit, in addition PanHaiDong also proposes to high-profile baidu split, will search engine operating alone, to limit baidu search engine abuse of dominant market position. Two meetings at eve, PanHaiDong says, will also and two committee members and of communication, puts forward relevant proposals, in the legislative level to make antitrust efforts. PanHaiDong in conference announced one study that included four content proposal, namely: one, to baidu split, will search engine operating alone, will baidu other product independent operation, restore related domain market and orderly competition; Two, at the first page of search results, a ban on advertising information and natural search results mixed row; Three, in the first page of search results,MLB hats banned their products association recommended priority; Four, increasing Internet industry administrative supervision of law enforcement agencies, make in time and effective implementation of the corresponding policies and regulation to interference in China, the Internet search engine market monopoly, curb unfair competition. Wen/in Puritan "unfair competition in business is illegal", this is the United States "the federal trade commission law" in the bill of the first sentence, and the law of a threat is also is well known. It is reported, about antitrust investigation of the elements, have three levels, one of, be application square in a relevant market defined; Second, by application square in the cognizance of the dominant market position; Third, by application square abuse of a dominant position that behavior. In a monopoly position of enterprise is not illegal in itself, once has the abuse of a dominant position of an act of unfair competition, already broke the law. Regulatory highlights for lack of interactive encyclopedia Sue baidu one case, whether to have antitrust investigation elements, its legal judgment, single from then on to China's antitrust case investigation will tell, is to have the rule of benchmarking significance, because before this, is not only the Internet field, in the Internet of other industries, also have no competition for antitrust investigations of the case. The interaction between public "challenge" baidu wikipedia, which is beneficial to the Internet and other industries to monopoly of the phenomenon of "attack", to promote fair competition in the industry, the healthy development off to a great start. As China's largest search engine and at the same time, the content is made in the baidu have abuse "authority", believe that baidu people cried foul, but what is abuse? Is not standard, this is also the case of a big attraction, or to the public the expectation of a standard, but also reflects the lack of law industry. Business model encounter bottleneck in addition, interactive encyclopedia that need and dependent on baidu, the interactive encyclopedia why dare to Sue baidu? A voice in the industry that is taking the NFL hats interactive encyclopedia hype, the fact is that, believe the same interactive encyclopedia party clearly understood. The Internet industry in China, not all of the enterprise to need to rely on baidu survival, such as dragons, SNS, everyone nets, happy nets, micro bo, refused to baidu grab information, this is because they create a new pattern, by their own power live, so, we applaud for interaction in wikipedia at the same time, whether should also reflect on why can't refuse to baidu interactive encyclopedia and live independently? To end legal ruling on PanHaiDong by four proposal contents of the second, third, and I do not look good. In my opinion, baidu is baidu has its own platform of page, they have the right to own advertising platform, but to other search and information have clear distinction, and to the position has drawn between, that is, not to participate in the search rankings, let consumer understand, this is baidu itself do advertising. But inside this and mixed with other issues, namely whether this will baidu search engine and other products split? The question is whether there is not defined baidu fair competition of the key, if not split, and how to ensure that all kinds of information in baidu search ranking of the fair, the final evaluation results, believe that the law will make the fair answer. But no matter how to, event shows that Chinese antitrust investigation need written into reality from, interactive encyclopedia will undoubtedly open the first, this also is event known as a hallmark of the reason.
See more:The Internet change "mutual choke nets"
War of the credit card