Media reports "tax the amendment, not through the". See the content, it is "the 11 th National People's Congress standing committee meeting 20, did not vote of individual income tax law of the state council submitted to the amendment,". Not paying a vote, of course, would be able to get through, but not paying voting actually mean more than not through. Voted, just talk to go up through the not through the problem; Has not paid to a vote, is whether through haven't included in the program. That is to say, a tax amendment, there are quite a distance away from through. According to disclosure, the amendment, working income tax will be reduced from the current standard for expenses of 2000 yuan a month improve a month to 3000 yuan, existing pay the tax calculated from half pay tax. Sounds, benefited range is quite extensive, but with the nominal wage increase, especially "five annual income doubled" plans, and price index, the rise of the $3000 tax exempt from the forehead I'm afraid and will soon make the low-income income tax be pay outstanding problems. Experts repeatedly knowledge popularization, said tax shall be exempted from the forehead cannot understand to the cutoff point, 3000 yuan shall be exempted from the forehead, from three thousand to a good deal of threshold. This is accurate, but but "$1 science" just, let people know that 3001 pieces of began to take taxation, truth be told, this kind of precise definition, not constitute the problems of the real world.
Around the snapback hats threshold adjustment, produced more controversial topics, including regional differences disputes, the family unit for taxation, etc. Regional differences of the dispute has two, one is said area income level is different, the standard shall is differ, for example in the balance of payments low levels of the place, can 2000 yuan to be taxable, revenues and expenditures of the high level is 5000 yuan for the place; Another problem is to improve the cutoff point to 3000 yuan, may make some local tax almost JueShou. I think, China's residents payments, urban and rural differences have, district difference, however, urban and rural and regional differences is should eliminate, not be cured, China is not BangLianZhi federalism or country, tax shall be exempted from the forehead is there any reason by area set up? You in Shanghai, 5000 yuan to be taxable, you in xining, is also tax 5000 yuan, it is beneficial to make all kinds of the resource and factors equilibrium flow, rather than the more developed to gather and reduce the gap. Improve the cutoff point, may make some local tax almost JueShou. This is a fact, in China, any place have a high income people, tax transferred to be higher, in any city, there are people, to the tax. Second, even if the cutoff point to improve the underdeveloped areas of the tax JueShou almost, and what's the problem? Based on the urban and rural and regional differences of huge exist, not developed area the government tax income decrease part, there are good buy sunglasses reasons in national range for transfer payments to balance, and not let not developed areas low-income tax to maintain local government tax revenue. To some extent, tax rate consistent enough. Don't place should be developed various tax has more relief, developed place shall not enjoy derate. This is to promote the development of regional balance method. However, the reality of the situation is generally, developed for exemption from the place more, not the developed local is not favorable, this "keeper of source, and increase the tax base" approach, really helpful for "part of the local part of the people" to get rich, but continue, won't produce "rich" after the actual help effect, on the contrary make the actual area and XianFuZhe have policy discourse is more and more big, more and more get the policy inclination.
As a family unit tax collection, related to social management basic data is complete, the current may have difficulty, but this is the direction, a less than can do beyond. However, China in the social management and control costs are huge, but even with the family unit and lack of tax collection of basic data support, it is visible to the direction of the social management has a lot of problems, the people of the order of the control over the behavior of the welfare of citizens concerned, this is the need to correct it.
Tax problem will have greater vision to witness. According to the statistical data, in 2010 the total income tax complete 7.3202 trillion yuan, accelerate the growth of 13.2%. In the same year, the personal income tax revenue of RMB 483.717 billion yuan, accelerate the growth of 16.4%. Personal income tax rate more than the total tax revenue growth, and individual income tax income tax revenue accounts for the proportion is only 6.6%. With such a tax burden, complete the tax increase, the total amount, gain and loss is worth ask. In 2006 China abolished the thousands of years of agricultural tax, the reason is not worth the cost, with hundreds of millions of farmers' burden, change is the national finance income increase of less than 1%. Tax of course no better than agricultural tax, it not only relates to financial income, and is the social equity. However, the truth is similar, even if only to high income tax collection, pass general of the working people, the influence of the amount of tax is quite limited, and a lot of the working people feel the happiness of general of social generated benign effect, may not be the government spend the same money can buy. Tax collection, need to have great wisdom, not all day in difficult about tax revenues.
See more:Why are afraid of the cold woman old more speed up
The U.S. real estate economic struggle